When choosing a conventionally powered vehicle, customers can pick a specific engine option—for instance, a four-cylinder TFSI or even a V6 power plant. When it comes to electric vehicles, however, there are probably very few customers out there who consider the difference between an asynchronous motor or a permanently excited synchronous motor to be a deciding factor. What matters is the overall performance of the powertrain. As Friedmann says, “There’s no point in building a high-performance electric motor if the high-voltage battery can’t put that power to work in the vehicle.”
For another example, look no further than the interaction between the traditional braking system and the electric motor’s recuperation behavior, which together are responsible for slowing the vehicle. This means that exceptional deceleration capabilities go hand in hand with the special nature of the thrust behavior.
What’s more, the fact that the car comes with electric motors on the front and rear axles as standard opens up a lot of new potential for refining driving dynamics at the upper end of the performance range. As a result, the chassis developers enjoy greater freedom in achieving optimum handling.
These new aspects call for a 360-degree approach to development. To this end, Audi has already pooled everything related to energy supply, storage and distribution in a single organisational unit. Looking ahead, this approach will be taken a step further by combining drive and chassis development into a single unit. Consequently, the drive, steering and braking systems will be controlled via an intelligent network.